ABF507 Critical Exam Questions - 8 Must-Know Topics (Full English)
16 分钟阅读
ABF507 Critical Exam Questions - 8 Must-Know Topics
🔥🔥🔥 CRITICAL: These 8 topic areas are VERY LIKELY to appear on the final exam. The exam typically has ~8 questions. Master these concepts + calculations!
📋 Exam Structure Overview
| Topic Area | Weight | Question Type |
|---|---|---|
| GDP Measurement | ~15-20% | Calculation + Concepts |
| Elasticity (PED, XED, YED) | ~15-20% | Calculation (Midpoint) + Application |
| Digital Finance & Money Supply | ~10-15% | Essay/Analysis |
| Ageing Population & Investment | ~10-15% | Essay/Analysis |
| Monetary Policy & Crowding Effects | ~10-15% | Essay/Analysis |
| Capital Outflows & M2 | ~10% | Essay/Analysis |
| Regression Analysis | ~10-15% | Interpretation + Policy |
| Fiscal vs Monetary Policy | ~10% | Comparison Essay |
🔥 TOPIC 1: GDP Measurement & Calculation
Key Concepts to Know:
- GDP Definition (4 key elements)
- 3 Measurement Methods (Production, Income, Expenditure)
- GDP vs GNP vs NDP
- Real GDP vs Nominal GDP
- GDP Deflator & Inflation Rate
Core Formulas
Expenditure Approach: $$GDP = C + I + G + (X - M)$$
Key Related Formulas:
- GNP = GDP + Net Factor Income from Abroad
- NDP = GDP - Depreciation
- GDP Deflator = (Nominal GDP / Real GDP) × 100
- Inflation Rate = [(Deflator₂ - Deflator₁) / Deflator₁] × 100%
Sample Question with Full Solution
Question: Calculate GDP, NDP, and GDP Deflator from the following data:
- C = $500B, I = $200B, G = $150B, X = $80B, M = $100B
- Depreciation = $50B
- Nominal GDP (Year 2) = $900B, Real GDP (Year 2) = $850B
💡 Click to View Complete Solution
Step 1: Calculate GDP $GDP = C + I + G + (X - M)$ $= 500 + 200 + 150 + (80 - 100)$ $= 500 + 200 + 150 - 20 = 830B$
Step 2: Calculate NDP $NDP = GDP - Depreciation = 830 - 50 = 780B$
Step 3: Calculate GDP Deflator $Deflator = \frac{900}{850} \times 100 = 105.88$
Step 4: Inflation Rate (if base year deflator = 100) $Inflation = \frac{105.88 - 100}{100} \times 100% = 5.88%$
Final Answers:
- GDP = $830 billion
- NDP = $780 billion
- GDP Deflator = 105.88
- Inflation Rate = 5.88%
🔥 TOPIC 2: Elasticity Calculation (Midpoint Method)
Must-Know Elasticity Types:
- PED (Price Elasticity of Demand) - How quantity responds to price changes
- XED (Cross-Price Elasticity) - Substitutes vs Complements
- YED (Income Elasticity) - Normal, Luxury, Inferior goods
CRITICAL: Always use Midpoint Method unless told otherwise!
Core Formulas
Midpoint Method (Standard for all elasticities):
$$PED = \frac{(Q_2 - Q_1) / [(Q_1 + Q_2)/2]}{(P_2 - P_1) / [(P_1 + P_2)/2]}$$
Interpretation Rules: | |Elasticity| | Meaning | Revenue Rule (Price↑) | |------------|---------|----------------------| | > 1 | Elastic | Revenue DECREASES | | < 1 | Inelastic | Revenue INCREASES | | = 1 | Unit Elastic | Revenue UNCHANGED |
XED Interpretation:
- Positive → Substitutes (gas price↑ → EV sales↑)
- Negative → Complements (printer price↑ → ink sales↓)
YED Interpretation:
-
1 → Luxury good (income↑ → demand↑↑)
- 0 < YED < 1 → Necessity
- < 0 → Inferior good (income↑ → demand↓)
Sample Question: Complete Elasticity Analysis
Question: A luxury store observes:
- Price drops from $500 to $400
- Quantity increases from 100 to 140 units Calculate PED and advise on pricing strategy.
💡 Click to View Complete Solution
Step 1: Calculate Midpoint Averages $Q_{avg} = \frac{100 + 140}{2} = 120$ $P_{avg} = \frac{500 + 400}{2} = 450$
Step 2: Calculate % Changes $%\Delta Q = \frac{140 - 100}{120} = \frac{40}{120} = 33.33%$ $%\Delta P = \frac{400 - 500}{450} = \frac{-100}{450} = -22.22%$
Step 3: Calculate PED $PED = \frac{33.33%}{-22.22%} = -1.50$
Answer: PED = -1.50 (|PED| = 1.50)
Classification: ELASTIC demand (|PED| > 1)
Pricing Strategy:
- Lower prices → Higher revenue
- Revenue at $500: 500 × 100 = $50,000
- Revenue at $400: 400 × 140 = $56,000
- Recommendation: Keep prices LOW
🔥 TOPIC 3: Digital Finance & Money Supply (M2)
Scenario: Digital banks offer high-yield e-savings products. Traditional banks face deposit outflows. Central bank data shows unexplained jump in M2.
Key Concepts:
- M2 = M1 + Savings + Time Deposits + Money Market Funds
- Money Multiplier Effect
- Reserve Requirements
- Digital Finance Disruption
Question Type 1: How Digital Finance Affects Money Supply
Question: Analyze how digital-finance innovation affects the measurement and control of money supply.
💡 Click to View Complete Answer
PART A: Effects on MEASUREMENT of Money Supply
Point 1: Blurred Boundaries Between M1 and M2
- Digital wallets and e-savings allow instant transfers
- Traditional distinction between "transaction" and "savings" accounts breaks down
- M2 may appear higher as funds move faster between categories
- Example: A $10,000 deposit can appear in multiple accounts simultaneously
Point 2: Velocity of Money Increases
- Digital payments are instantaneous
- Same money used more times per period
- Traditional M2 measurements may underestimate economic activity
- Real-time payment systems make money "work harder"
Point 3: Shadow Banking Not Captured
- Peer-to-peer lending platforms create credit outside traditional banking
- FinTech credit not fully reflected in official M2 statistics
- Cryptocurrency holdings exist entirely outside M2
PART B: Effects on CONTROL of Money Supply
Point 1: Reserve Requirements Become Less Effective
- Digital banks may hold lower reserves (operating online is cheaper)
- Money can flow instantly to non-bank platforms
- Central bank's reserve ratio tool has diminished impact
Point 2: Interest Rate Transmission Weakened
- Digital platforms may offer rates independent of policy rate
- Consumers can quickly switch to highest-yield platform
- Traditional banks lose control of deposit pricing
Point 3: Cross-Border Flows Increase
- Digital finance enables easy international transfers
- Domestic monetary policy affected by global capital movements
- Central bank has less control over domestic money supply
Question Type 2: Central Bank Adaptation
Question: Suggest 3 approaches for how the central bank should adapt reserve requirements.
💡 Click to View Complete Answer
Approach 1: Extend Reserve Requirements to Digital Platforms
- Apply same reserve ratios to e-money issuers and digital wallets
- Ensures level playing field between traditional and digital banks
- Maintains effectiveness of monetary policy transmission
- Example: Require Alipay/WeChat Pay to hold reserves with central bank
Approach 2: Implement Dynamic/Tiered Reserve Requirements
- Adjust reserve ratios based on deposit velocity and risk profile
- Higher reserves for highly liquid digital accounts
- Lower reserves for locked-term deposits
- Use real-time data to calibrate requirements
Approach 3: Introduce Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)
- Issue digital currency directly from central bank
- Provides alternative to private digital platforms
- Gives central bank direct control over digital money supply
- Can implement programmable monetary policy
Additional Approach: Enhanced Monitoring & Reporting
- Require real-time transaction reporting from digital platforms
- Develop new metrics beyond traditional M2
- Collaborate internationally on cross-border digital flows
🔥 TOPIC 4: Ageing Population & Investment
Scenario: Country Bronland has aging population and shrinking labor force. Households increase precautionary savings, but firms reduce investment due to lower demand expectations.
Key Concepts:
- Demographic transition
- Dependency ratio
- Precautionary savings
- Investment determinants
- Fiscal policy limitations
Question Type 1: How Ageing Hinders Investment
Question: Discuss TWO points on how an ageing population may hinder investment.
💡 Click to View Complete Answer
Point 1: Reduced Consumer Demand → Lower Business Investment
- Elderly consume less (no need for houses, cars, furniture)
- Shrinking working-age population = fewer consumers
- Businesses see declining future demand
- Rational response: reduce investment in new capacity
- Example: Japan's "lost decades" - aging demographics contributed to weak investment
Point 2: Labor Shortage → Reduced Marginal Productivity of Capital
- Investment requires workers to operate new capital
- With fewer workers, return on investment decreases
- Marginal productivity of capital falls
- Firms invest less because each new machine generates less output
- Example: A factory is useless without workers
Additional Points (if asked for more):
Point 3: Pension Obligations Crowd Out Corporate Investment
- Companies with defined benefit pensions face rising costs
- More profits go to pension funding, less to reinvestment
- Older workers = higher healthcare and pension expenses
Point 4: Risk Aversion Increases
- Older population prefers safe assets (bonds) over risky investments (stocks)
- Less capital available for business expansion
- Higher cost of equity capital
Question Type 2: Why Fiscal Policy May Fail
Question: Discuss TWO points on how fiscal policy might fail to stimulate investment under ageing population conditions.
💡 Click to View Complete Answer
Point 1: Crowding Out Effect
- Government borrows to fund fiscal stimulus
- Increased demand for loanable funds → higher interest rates
- Higher rates discourage private investment
- In aging economy, savings may be insufficient → crowding out more severe
- Net effect: Government spending replaces rather than adds to investment
Point 2: Ricardian Equivalence / Expectation Effects
- Households expect future tax increases to pay for current spending
- Rational response: save more now (especially elderly concerned about future)
- Increased savings offset stimulus spending
- Aggregate demand remains unchanged
- Investment unchanged because demand unchanged
Additional Points:
Point 3: Structural vs Cyclical Problem
- Fiscal stimulus works for cyclical downturns
- Ageing is a STRUCTURAL problem
- Temporary stimulus cannot fix permanent demographic shift
- Businesses won't invest based on temporary demand boost
Point 4: Rising Healthcare/Pension Spending Limits Fiscal Space
- Government already spending heavily on elderly care
- Less room for productive infrastructure investment
- Fiscal multiplier reduced when spending goes to transfers
🔥 TOPIC 5: M2 Contraction & Deflation
Scenario: After a major bank failure, households withdrew deposits, reducing M2 by 15%. Investment plunged, and the currency strengthened unexpectedly.
Question: Why M2 Contraction Causes Deflationary Pressure
💡 Click to View Complete Answer
Main Transmission Mechanism:
Step 1: M2 Falls → Less Money in Circulation
- Bank failure triggers panic withdrawals
- Money multiplier works in reverse
- Credit creation collapses
- Total money supply shrinks significantly
Step 2: Less Money → Lower Aggregate Demand
- Households and firms have less liquidity
- Consumption (C) falls as people hoard cash
- Investment (I) falls as credit dries up
- AD curve shifts LEFT
Step 3: Lower AD → Downward Pressure on Prices
- With same supply but less demand, prices fall
- Firms cut prices to attract scarce customers
- Wage pressures turn negative
- Deflation begins
Step 4: Deflation Expectations Create Spiral
- If people expect prices to fall, they delay purchases
- Delay reduces demand further
- Creates self-fulfilling deflationary spiral
- Real interest rates rise (nominal rates can't go below zero)
Why Currency Strengthens:
- Less money in circulation → each unit worth more
- Deflation increases purchasing power of domestic currency
- International investors attracted by strengthening currency
- Higher real interest rates attract capital inflows
Additional Effects:
- Debt burden increases in real terms
- Bankruptcies rise as real debt grows
- Investment falls further (debt deflation)
- Economic contraction deepens
🔥 TOPIC 6: Monetary Easing, Crowding Effects & Capital Outflows
Scenario: Country Araland's central bank unexpectedly reduces policy rate from 3.0% to 1.5% to stimulate growth. Household savings fall slightly, investment surges, inflation expectations rise.
Question Part (i): Crowding Out vs Crowding In
Question: Discuss TWO ways monetary easing may crowd out OR crowd in private investment in the long term.
💡 Click to View Complete Answer
CROWDING IN Effects (Investment INCREASES):
Effect 1: Lower Borrowing Costs Stimulate Investment
- Interest rate falls from 3% to 1.5%
- Cost of capital decreases for businesses
- More investment projects become profitable (NPV positive)
- Firms borrow more to expand capacity
- Private investment "crowded in" by cheap credit
Effect 2: Improved Business Confidence
- Central bank action signals commitment to growth
- Confidence improves → animal spirits revive
- Investment decisions often based on expectations
- Positive sentiment leads to increased capital spending
- Multiplier effects spread through economy
CROWDING OUT Effects (Investment DECREASES in long run):
Effect 1: Asset Price Inflation Reduces Productive Investment
- Low rates push investors into riskier assets
- Stock prices, property prices inflate
- Capital flows into speculation rather than productive investment
- Creates bubbles that eventually burst
- Long-term investment distorted
Effect 2: Inflation Expectations Create Uncertainty
- Aggressive easing raises inflation expectations
- Uncertainty about future real returns
- Businesses hesitate to commit to long-term investment
- Planning becomes difficult
- Investment may actually decline despite low rates
Question Part (ii): Capital Outflows
Question: Evaluate TWO potential ways capital outflows may occur.
💡 Click to View Complete Answer
Mechanism 1: Interest Rate Differential Drives Hot Money Out
- Domestic interest rate falls from 3% to 1.5%
- Foreign rates remain higher (e.g., US at 4%)
- Carry trade reverses: investors move money abroad
- Capital outflows weaken domestic currency
- Creates downward pressure on exchange rate
Consequences:
- Currency depreciation increases import prices
- Central bank may need to intervene
- Foreign exchange reserves depleted
- Can trigger financial instability
Mechanism 2: Loss of Confidence in Policy / Currency
- Unexpected, aggressive rate cut may signal desperation
- Investors question central bank credibility
- Fear of future inflation or currency collapse
- Capital flight to "safe haven" currencies (USD, CHF)
- Self-fulfilling crisis possible
Consequences:
- Stock market sells off
- Bond yields may rise despite rate cut (risk premium)
- Economic instability worsens
- Policy objective undermined
Mitigating Factors (may slow outflows):
- Capital controls if in place
- Currency depreciation makes exports competitive
- Higher inflation expectations may attract some investors betting on assets
🔥 TOPIC 7: Regression Analysis & Interpretation
Regression Model: $$CO_2 = 1.8 + 0.6 \times GDPcapita_{(2.00)} + 0.4 \times Gini_{(2.01)} - 0.3 \times GreenInvestment_{(3.21)}$$
Where figures in brackets are t-statistics.
Decision Rule: |t| > 2 → Statistically significant at 5% level
Question: Interpret Effects of Inequality and Green Investment
Question: Debate TWO points each on how inequality and green investment affect environmental outcomes in ASEAN, specifically referring to the regression results.
💡 Click to View Complete Answer
PART A: Effect of Inequality (Gini) on CO₂
Coefficient: +0.4 (t = 2.01, significant at 5%)
Point 1: Higher Inequality → Higher Emissions (Direct Effect)
- Coefficient = +0.4 means: for every 1-unit increase in Gini, CO₂ increases by 0.4 units
- Statistically significant (t = 2.01 > 2)
- Explanation: Wealthy elites consume disproportionately more (private jets, multiple homes)
- Economic polarization reduces collective action on environment
- Political power of rich may block environmental regulations
Point 2: Counter-argument - Inequality May Not Be the True Cause
- Correlation ≠ causation
- Gini may correlate with development stage
- Rapidly growing countries often have both high Gini AND high emissions
- Omitted variable bias possible (industrialization affects both)
- Policy implication: focus on growth pattern, not just inequality
PART B: Effect of Green Investment on CO₂
Coefficient: -0.3 (t = 3.21, highly significant)
Point 1: Green Investment Reduces Emissions (Strong Evidence)
- Coefficient = -0.3 means: each unit of green investment reduces CO₂ by 0.3 units
- Highly significant (t = 3.21 > 2)
- Explanation: Investment in renewable energy, clean technology
- Replaces fossil fuel infrastructure
- Creates sustainable production methods
- Policy implication: Strong support for green investment incentives
Point 2: Counter-argument - Diminishing Returns / Time Lag
- Initial green investments have high impact
- May show diminishing returns over time
- Benefits may take years to materialize
- Current data may underestimate long-term effects
- Political will needed for sustained investment
Policy Recommendations Based on Results:
- Reduce inequality through progressive taxation and social programs
- Increase green investment through subsidies and carbon pricing
- Focus on sustainable development not just GDP growth
🔥 TOPIC 8: Fiscal Policy vs Monetary Policy Comparison
Key Comparison Points:
- Who controls? (Central Bank vs Government)
- Tools used
- Transmission mechanism
- Speed of implementation
- Limitations
Complete Comparison Table
💡 Click to View Complete Comparison
| Aspect | Monetary Policy | Fiscal Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Authority | Central Bank (independent) | Government (political) |
| Main Tools | Interest rates, Open Market Operations, Reserve Requirements | Government Spending, Taxation |
| Expansionary | Lower rates, Buy bonds, Lower reserves | Increase G, Cut taxes |
| Contractionary | Raise rates, Sell bonds, Raise reserves | Cut G, Raise taxes |
| Speed | Fast (weeks) | Slow (months for legislation) |
| Precision | Less precise (indirect) | More targeted (specific sectors) |
| Political | Independent, less political | Highly political |
| Limitations | Liquidity trap, time lags | Crowding out, legislative delays |
When Each Works Best:
- Monetary Policy: Fine-tuning, inflation control, financial stability
- Fiscal Policy: Deep recession, infrastructure investment, targeted support
Transmission Mechanisms:
Monetary: $\text{Rate Cut} \rightarrow \text{Cheaper Borrowing} \rightarrow C\uparrow + I\uparrow \rightarrow AD\uparrow$
Fiscal: $G\uparrow \text{ or } T\downarrow \rightarrow \text{More Spending} \rightarrow AD\uparrow$
📊 Summary: 8 Topics at a Glance
| # | Topic | Key Formula/Concept | Exam Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GDP | C + I + G + (X-M) | Know 3 methods + deflator |
| 2 | Elasticity | Midpoint Method | Calculate + interpret + revenue |
| 3 | Digital Finance | M2 = M1 + savings | Central bank adaptation |
| 4 | Ageing & Investment | Demographics | Structural vs cyclical |
| 5 | M2 & Deflation | Money supply contraction | Deflationary spiral |
| 6 | Crowding Effects | Interest rates | In vs Out |
| 7 | Regression | t-stat > 2 = significant | Policy implications |
| 8 | Monetary vs Fiscal | Compare tools | Know limitations |
🎯 Final Exam Checklist
Before the exam, make sure you can:
- Calculate GDP using expenditure approach
- Calculate Real GDP, GDP Deflator, Inflation Rate
- Apply Midpoint Method for any elasticity type
- Interpret PED, XED, YED values
- Explain how digital finance affects M2
- Discuss ageing population's impact on investment
- Analyze M2 contraction → deflation mechanism
- Distinguish crowding in vs crowding out
- Interpret regression coefficients and t-statistics
- Compare monetary and fiscal policy
Last updated: January 25, 2026
#ABF507#Must-Know#Exam Critical#Digital Finance#Monetary Policy#M2#Ageing Population#Capital Outflows#Regression